UFC 331/Featherweight · 5×5

Independent projection

medium confidence

Evloev 61%

Moderate conviction. The point estimate is the center of a band, not a prophecy.

Evloev 61%Lopes 39%

90% interval on Evloev: 46%73%. Never a lock.

Most likely
Decision 78%
Expected time
21:18
P(over 2.5)
88%
Grappling share
31%

Model vs market

No edge ≥ 5%
SideModelDK (no vig)Fanatics (no vig)DK juiceEdge vs DK
Evloev60.5%62.2%62.4%-185 (64.9%)-1.7%
Lopes39.5%37.8%37.6%+154 (39.4%)+1.7%

DK opened -170 / +145. Now -185 / +154. Line movement is market context, not a model input.

DK total 2.5: over -115 / under +87. Model P(over 2.5) 88%.

Books last snapshotted 19 Aug 2026, 4:00 PM ET. Fanatics and DraftKings will not always post the same PFL/ONE markets.

Briefing

Movsar Evloev is the model’s side at 61% because of recency and opponent-adjusted form, with Diego Lopes live if the fight is forced into submission hunter.

Movsar Evloev (pressure wrestler, point fighter, sambo) against Diego Lopes (submission hunter, power puncher, opportunistic) is a UFC featherweight matchup in Los Angeles, CA. The independent model puts Evloev around 61% — a medium confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is recency and opponent-adjusted form: Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Evloev +0.55 vs Lopes -0.69. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.

Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 31%. Evloev lands 4.2 significant strikes per minute at 49% accuracy with a 3.4 takedown average; Lopes is at 4.6 / 48% / 2.0. Takedown defense sits at 86% versus 62%. Reach is 70" against 72" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.

Evloev's primary path: Chain takedowns on Lopes's 62% defense, hold mat time, and win the control/attrition round. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Lopes's preferred range and losing the minute-winning. Lopes's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Evloev enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: If the first takedown lands, Lopes may spend the round on the fence or on their back.

The swing variable is simple: If Evloev cannot keep this on the mat in the first eight minutes, Lopes's striking becomes the fight. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.

Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.

Evloev — paths

  1. Chain takedowns on Lopes's 62% defense, hold mat time, and win the control/attrition round.
  2. Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Evloev's length and volume only matter if Lopes cannot crash the pocket.
  3. Make it ugly and long. The five-round cardio gap is a real path if the first two stay close.

Failure modes

  • Getting drawn into Lopes's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.

Lopes — paths

  1. One clean counter or lead hook as Evloev enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
  2. Force a scramble, hunt the neck or the front headlock, and finish before the referee stands them up.

Failure modes

  • If the first takedown lands, Lopes may spend the round on the fence or on their back.

Swing variables

  • If Evloev cannot keep this on the mat in the first eight minutes, Lopes's striking becomes the fight.
  • First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.
  • Pace through round 3. The championship-round cardio gap is large enough to flip a close fight.

What moved it from 50/50

  • Recency and opponent-adjusted formEvloev +0.27

    Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Evloev +0.55 vs Lopes -0.69. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.

  • Grappling / controlEvloev +0.15

    Takedown threat Evloev 1.81 vs Lopes 0.81 per 15. Estimated grappling share 31%.

  • Five-round cardio & late outputEvloev +0.08

    Championship/main-event time. Fighters who fade in R3 of threes get a larger penalty here; grinders and late finishers get paid.

  • Finishing threat vs durabilityLopes 0.08

    Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.

  • Pressure wrestling vs takedown defenseEvloev +0.05

    Lopes's takedown defense (62%) is a hole against a high-volume wrestler. Historically this pair type tilts to control and attrition.

  • Striking skill (distance & pocket)Lopes 0.04

    Evloev striking rating 1700 vs Lopes 1720. Weighted by estimated standing time (69%).

  • Age / athletic windowLopes 0.03

    Evloev 32 vs Lopes 31. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.

Attribute radar

Evloev · Lopes

Side-by-side

Evloev: pressure wrestler · point fighter · samboLopes: submission hunter · power puncher · opportunistic

EvloevLopes
Record19-026-7
Age (fight night)3231
Height5'7"5'10"
Reach70"72"
StanceOrthodoxOrthodox
SLpM4.24.6
SApM2.64.0
Str. acc.49%48%
Str. def.64%52%
KD / 150.200.55
TD avg3.42.0
TD acc.48%41%
TD def.86%62%
Sub avg0.31.2
Control / 155.0m4.6m
Late-round diff0.160.08
Layoff126d126d
Datadeepdeep

Evloev range mix

  • Distance
    64%
  • Clinch
    14%
  • Ground
    38%
  • Head
    58%
  • Body
    22%
  • Leg
    20%

Lopes range mix

  • Distance
    74%
  • Clinch
    14%
  • Ground
    42%
  • Head
    68%
  • Body
    22%
  • Leg
    10%

Method of victory

  • Evloev KO/TKO
    4%
  • Evloev SUB
    4%
  • Evloev DEC
    52%
  • Lopes KO/TKO
    3%
  • Lopes SUB
    11%
  • Lopes DEC
    25%