Noche UFC/Lightweight · 3×5
Independent projection
medium confidenceRuffy 67%
Moderate conviction. The point estimate is the center of a band, not a prophecy.
90% interval on Zellhuber: 21%–47%. Never a lock.
- Most likely
- Decision 70%
- Expected time
- 12:48
- P(over 2.5)
- 74%
- Grappling share
- 19%
Model vs market
Value Ruffy 9.5%| Side | Model | DK (no vig) | Fanatics (no vig) | DK juice | Edge vs DK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zellhuber | 32.6% | 42.0% | 42.5% | +130 (43.5%) | -9.5% |
| Ruffy | 67.5% | 58.0% | 57.5% | -150 (60.0%) | +9.5% |
DK opened +120 / -140. Now +130 / -150. Line movement is market context, not a model input.
DK total 2.5: over -105 / under +95. Model P(over 2.5) 74%.
Books last snapshotted 19 Aug 2026, 4:00 PM ET. Fanatics and DraftKings will not always post the same PFL/ONE markets.
Briefing
Mauricio Ruffy is the model’s side at 67% because of striking skill (distance & pocket), with Daniel Zellhuber live if the fight is forced into volume kickboxer.
Daniel Zellhuber (volume kickboxer, opportunistic) against Mauricio Ruffy (power puncher, muay thai, pressure boxer) is a UFC lightweight matchup in Glendale, AZ. The independent model puts Ruffy around 67% — a medium confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is striking skill (distance & pocket): Zellhuber striking rating 1429 vs Ruffy 1780. Weighted by estimated standing time (81%).
Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 19%. Zellhuber lands 4.3 significant strikes per minute at 45% accuracy with a 1.6 takedown average; Ruffy is at 5.4 / 47% / 0.4. Takedown defense sits at 70% versus 58%. Reach is 76" against 73" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.
Zellhuber's primary path: Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Zellhuber's length and volume only matter if Ruffy cannot crash the pocket. Failure mode: The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math. Ruffy's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Zellhuber enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Zellhuber's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.
The swing variable is simple: First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.
Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.
Zellhuber — paths
- Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Zellhuber's length and volume only matter if Ruffy cannot crash the pocket.
- Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.
Failure modes
- The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.
Ruffy — paths
- One clean counter or lead hook as Zellhuber enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
- Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.
- Clinch, dirty box, and kick the lead leg until Zellhuber's entries slow.
Failure modes
- Getting drawn into Zellhuber's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.
Swing variables
- First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.
What moved it from 50/50
- Striking skill (distance & pocket)Ruffy −0.84
Zellhuber striking rating 1429 vs Ruffy 1780. Weighted by estimated standing time (81%).
- Reach that is actually usedZellhuber +0.13
Zellhuber has a 3" reach edge and the film profile (kicks / distance striking) says they actually spend time at range. Reach without range usage is ignored.
- Grappling / controlZellhuber +0.09
Takedown threat Zellhuber 0.80 vs Ruffy 0.18 per 15. Estimated grappling share 19%.
- Finishing threat vs durabilityRuffy −0.05
Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.
- Age / athletic windowRuffy −0.01
Zellhuber 27 vs Ruffy 30. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.
- Recency and opponent-adjusted formRuffy −0.01
Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Zellhuber +0.24 vs Ruffy +0.30. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.
Attribute radar
Zellhuber · Ruffy
Side-by-side
Zellhuber: volume kickboxer · opportunistic — Ruffy: power puncher · muay thai · pressure boxer
| Zellhuber | Ruffy | |
|---|---|---|
| Record | 15-2 | 12-1 |
| Age (fight night) | 27 | 30 |
| Height | 6'1" | 5'11" |
| Reach | 76" | 73" |
| Stance | Orthodox | Orthodox |
| SLpM | 4.3 | 5.4 |
| SApM | 3.3 | 3.6 |
| Str. acc. | 45% | 47% |
| Str. def. | 54% | 52% |
| KD / 15 | 0.40 | 1.05 |
| TD avg | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| TD acc. | 36% | 36% |
| TD def. | 70% | 58% |
| Sub avg | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| Control / 15 | 2.0m | 2.0m |
| Late-round diff | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| Layoff | 84d | 98d |
| Data | deep | deep |
Zellhuber range mix
- Distance82%
- Clinch14%
- Ground6%
- Head58%
- Body22%
- Leg28%
Ruffy range mix
- Distance72%
- Clinch28%
- Ground6%
- Head65%
- Body22%
- Leg30%
Method of victory
- Zellhuber KO/TKO4%
- Zellhuber SUB5%
- Zellhuber DEC24%
- Ruffy KO/TKO19%
- Ruffy SUB3%
- Ruffy DEC46%