Noche UFC/Lightweight · 3×5

Independent projection

medium confidence

Ruffy 67%

Moderate conviction. The point estimate is the center of a band, not a prophecy.

Zellhuber 33%Ruffy 67%

90% interval on Zellhuber: 21%47%. Never a lock.

Most likely
Decision 70%
Expected time
12:48
P(over 2.5)
74%
Grappling share
19%

Model vs market

Value Ruffy 9.5%
SideModelDK (no vig)Fanatics (no vig)DK juiceEdge vs DK
Zellhuber32.6%42.0%42.5%+130 (43.5%)-9.5%
Ruffy67.5%58.0%57.5%-150 (60.0%)+9.5%

DK opened +120 / -140. Now +130 / -150. Line movement is market context, not a model input.

DK total 2.5: over -105 / under +95. Model P(over 2.5) 74%.

Books last snapshotted 19 Aug 2026, 4:00 PM ET. Fanatics and DraftKings will not always post the same PFL/ONE markets.

Briefing

Mauricio Ruffy is the model’s side at 67% because of striking skill (distance & pocket), with Daniel Zellhuber live if the fight is forced into volume kickboxer.

Daniel Zellhuber (volume kickboxer, opportunistic) against Mauricio Ruffy (power puncher, muay thai, pressure boxer) is a UFC lightweight matchup in Glendale, AZ. The independent model puts Ruffy around 67% — a medium confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is striking skill (distance & pocket): Zellhuber striking rating 1429 vs Ruffy 1780. Weighted by estimated standing time (81%).

Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 19%. Zellhuber lands 4.3 significant strikes per minute at 45% accuracy with a 1.6 takedown average; Ruffy is at 5.4 / 47% / 0.4. Takedown defense sits at 70% versus 58%. Reach is 76" against 73" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.

Zellhuber's primary path: Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Zellhuber's length and volume only matter if Ruffy cannot crash the pocket. Failure mode: The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math. Ruffy's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Zellhuber enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Zellhuber's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.

The swing variable is simple: First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.

Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.

Zellhuber — paths

  1. Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Zellhuber's length and volume only matter if Ruffy cannot crash the pocket.
  2. Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.

Failure modes

  • The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.

Ruffy — paths

  1. One clean counter or lead hook as Zellhuber enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
  2. Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.
  3. Clinch, dirty box, and kick the lead leg until Zellhuber's entries slow.

Failure modes

  • Getting drawn into Zellhuber's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.

Swing variables

  • First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.

What moved it from 50/50

  • Striking skill (distance & pocket)Ruffy 0.84

    Zellhuber striking rating 1429 vs Ruffy 1780. Weighted by estimated standing time (81%).

  • Reach that is actually usedZellhuber +0.13

    Zellhuber has a 3" reach edge and the film profile (kicks / distance striking) says they actually spend time at range. Reach without range usage is ignored.

  • Grappling / controlZellhuber +0.09

    Takedown threat Zellhuber 0.80 vs Ruffy 0.18 per 15. Estimated grappling share 19%.

  • Finishing threat vs durabilityRuffy 0.05

    Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.

  • Age / athletic windowRuffy 0.01

    Zellhuber 27 vs Ruffy 30. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.

  • Recency and opponent-adjusted formRuffy 0.01

    Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Zellhuber +0.24 vs Ruffy +0.30. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.

Attribute radar

Zellhuber · Ruffy

Side-by-side

Zellhuber: volume kickboxer · opportunisticRuffy: power puncher · muay thai · pressure boxer

ZellhuberRuffy
Record15-212-1
Age (fight night)2730
Height6'1"5'11"
Reach76"73"
StanceOrthodoxOrthodox
SLpM4.35.4
SApM3.33.6
Str. acc.45%47%
Str. def.54%52%
KD / 150.401.05
TD avg1.60.4
TD acc.36%36%
TD def.70%58%
Sub avg0.60.3
Control / 152.0m2.0m
Late-round diff0.060.04
Layoff84d98d
Datadeepdeep

Zellhuber range mix

  • Distance
    82%
  • Clinch
    14%
  • Ground
    6%
  • Head
    58%
  • Body
    22%
  • Leg
    28%

Ruffy range mix

  • Distance
    72%
  • Clinch
    28%
  • Ground
    6%
  • Head
    65%
  • Body
    22%
  • Leg
    30%

Method of victory

  • Zellhuber KO/TKO
    4%
  • Zellhuber SUB
    5%
  • Zellhuber DEC
    24%
  • Ruffy KO/TKO
    19%
  • Ruffy SUB
    3%
  • Ruffy DEC
    46%