Hypothetical · three rounds · current snapshots
Independent projection
low confidenceRodrigues 52%
Wide interval. Thin public data, volatile styles, or a true toss-up. Do not treat the point estimate as a price.
90% interval on Spivac: 33%–63%. Never a lock.
- Most likely
- Decision 67%
- Expected time
- 12:36
- P(over 2.5)
- 72%
- Grappling share
- 32%
Briefing
Gregory Rodrigues is the model’s side at 52% because of striking skill (distance & pocket), with Serghei Spivac live if the fight is forced into pressure wrestler.
Serghei Spivac (pressure wrestler, ground pounder, clinch grinder) against Gregory Rodrigues (power puncher, pressure boxer, opportunistic) is a UFC heavyweight matchup in —. The independent model puts Rodrigues around 52% — a low confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is striking skill (distance & pocket): Spivac striking rating 1480 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (68%).
Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 32%. Spivac lands 3.2 significant strikes per minute at 52% accuracy with a 3.8 takedown average; Rodrigues is at 5.2 / 51% / 1.6. Takedown defense sits at 72% versus 61%. Reach is 78" against 75" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.
Spivac's primary path: Chain takedowns on Rodrigues's 61% defense, hold mat time, and win the control/attrition round. Failure mode: The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math. Rodrigues's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Spivac enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: If the first takedown lands, Rodrigues may spend the round on the fence or on their back.
The swing variable is simple: If Spivac cannot keep this on the mat in the first eight minutes, Rodrigues's striking becomes the fight. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.
Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.
Spivac — paths
- Chain takedowns on Rodrigues's 61% defense, hold mat time, and win the control/attrition round.
- Force a scramble, hunt the neck or the front headlock, and finish before the referee stands them up.
Failure modes
- The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.
Rodrigues — paths
- One clean counter or lead hook as Spivac enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
- Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.
Failure modes
- If the first takedown lands, Rodrigues may spend the round on the fence or on their back.
Swing variables
- If Spivac cannot keep this on the mat in the first eight minutes, Rodrigues's striking becomes the fight.
- First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.
What moved it from 50/50
- Striking skill (distance & pocket)Rodrigues −0.52
Spivac striking rating 1480 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (68%).
- Grappling / controlSpivac +0.29
Takedown threat Spivac 2.01 vs Rodrigues 0.73 per 15. Estimated grappling share 32%.
- Recency and opponent-adjusted formSpivac +0.12
Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Spivac +0.55 vs Rodrigues +0.02. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.
- Power vs durabilityRodrigues −0.11
Spivac has been hurt at a rate that matters against Rodrigues's power.
- Age / athletic windowSpivac +0.07
Spivac 31 vs Rodrigues 34. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.
- Pressure wrestling vs takedown defenseSpivac +0.06
Rodrigues's takedown defense (61%) is a hole against a high-volume wrestler. Historically this pair type tilts to control and attrition.
- Finishing threat vs durabilitySpivac +0.01
Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.
Attribute radar
Spivac · Rodrigues
Side-by-side
Spivac: pressure wrestler · ground pounder · clinch grinder — Rodrigues: power puncher · pressure boxer · opportunistic
| Spivac | Rodrigues | |
|---|---|---|
| Record | 17-5 | 16-6 |
| Age (fight night) | 31 | 34 |
| Height | 6'3" | 6'2" |
| Reach | 78" | 75" |
| Stance | Orthodox | Orthodox |
| SLpM | 3.2 | 5.2 |
| SApM | 2.4 | 4.1 |
| Str. acc. | 52% | 51% |
| Str. def. | 55% | 49% |
| KD / 15 | 0.28 | 0.92 |
| TD avg | 3.8 | 1.6 |
| TD acc. | 46% | 38% |
| TD def. | 72% | 61% |
| Sub avg | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| Control / 15 | 5.8m | 1.8m |
| Late-round diff | 0.10 | -0.08 |
| Layoff | 140d | 126d |
| Data | deep | deep |
Spivac range mix
- Distance40%
- Clinch16%
- Ground44%
- Head58%
- Body22%
- Leg20%
Rodrigues range mix
- Distance72%
- Clinch12%
- Ground16%
- Head64%
- Body20%
- Leg16%
DraftKings / Fanatics props
Method, rounds, distance, and inside-the-distance markets the books actually post. Model probability is independent. Edge is model minus DraftKings no-vig. Fanatics is a second print — it will not always be up, especially on PFL and ONE.
Method of victory
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Spivac KO/TKO
Model
5.5%
Fair
+1708
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Spivac submission
Model
11.6%
Fair
+761
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Spivac decision
Model
30.6%
Fair
+226
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues KO/TKO
Model
10.9%
Fair
+817
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues submission
Model
4.9%
Fair
+1953
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues decision
Model
36.4%
Fair
+174
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Model split: KO/TKO 16% · submission 16% · decision 67%
- Career KO rates (shrunk by the book, not the model): Spivac 41% · Rodrigues 69%
- Standing share 68%. Book prices come from moneyline × career mix; CORNER splits the same win probability by knockdown rate, sub attempts, and durability.
Over/under 1.5 rounds
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Over 1.5 rounds
Model
81.7%
Fair
-446
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Under 1.5 rounds
Model
18.3%
Fair
+446
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Finish mass 33% · decision 67%
- Grappling share 32% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
- Over 1.5: model needs the fight to clear the 1.5-round mark (P 82%)
Over/under 2.5 rounds
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Over 2.5 rounds
Model
71.8%
Fair
-255
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Under 2.5 rounds
Model
28.2%
Fair
+255
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Finish mass 33% · decision 67%
- Grappling share 32% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
- Over 2.5: model needs the fight to clear the 2.5-round mark (P 72%)
Fight goes the distance
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Goes the distance
Model
67.1%
Fair
-204
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Does not go the distance
Model
32.9%
Fair
+204
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Decision mass Spivac 31% + Rodrigues 36%
- Finish mass 33% from KO/SUB on either side
- 3×5. Expected time 12.6 min
Inside the distance
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Spivac inside the distance
Model
17.1%
Fair
+483
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Spivac not inside the distance
Model
82.8%
Fair
-483
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues inside the distance
Model
15.8%
Fair
+534
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues not inside the distance
Model
84.2%
Fair
-534
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- KO 6% + SUB 12%
- Spivac 0.28 KD / 15 · 41% of wins by KO/TKO
- Spivac 0.7 sub attempts / 15 · 47% of wins by submission
Round of finish
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Fight ends in round 1
Model
18.3%
Fair
+446
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Fight ends in round 2
Model
9.9%
Fair
+910
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Fight ends in round 3
Model
4.7%
Fair
+2019
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Finish-by-round split from the duration curve, not a separate engine
- Total finish mass 33% distributed across 3 rounds
- Decision is a different market (goes the distance). Round field is vig-removed against that residual.