Compare

Any two fighters, current snapshots, three-round hypothetical. Not a booked fight — the engine still runs the same factors.

Hypothetical · three rounds · current snapshots

Independent projection

low confidence

Rodrigues 52%

Wide interval. Thin public data, volatile styles, or a true toss-up. Do not treat the point estimate as a price.

Spivac 48%Rodrigues 52%

90% interval on Spivac: 33%–63%. Never a lock.

Most likely
Decision 67%
Expected time
12:36
P(over 2.5)
72%
Grappling share
32%

Briefing

Gregory Rodrigues is the model’s side at 52% because of striking skill (distance & pocket), with Serghei Spivac live if the fight is forced into pressure wrestler.

Serghei Spivac (pressure wrestler, ground pounder, clinch grinder) against Gregory Rodrigues (power puncher, pressure boxer, opportunistic) is a UFC heavyweight matchup in —. The independent model puts Rodrigues around 52% — a low confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is striking skill (distance & pocket): Spivac striking rating 1480 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (68%).

Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 32%. Spivac lands 3.2 significant strikes per minute at 52% accuracy with a 3.8 takedown average; Rodrigues is at 5.2 / 51% / 1.6. Takedown defense sits at 72% versus 61%. Reach is 78" against 75" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.

Spivac's primary path: Chain takedowns on Rodrigues's 61% defense, hold mat time, and win the control/attrition round. Failure mode: The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math. Rodrigues's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Spivac enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: If the first takedown lands, Rodrigues may spend the round on the fence or on their back.

The swing variable is simple: If Spivac cannot keep this on the mat in the first eight minutes, Rodrigues's striking becomes the fight. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.

Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.

Spivac — paths

  1. Chain takedowns on Rodrigues's 61% defense, hold mat time, and win the control/attrition round.
  2. Force a scramble, hunt the neck or the front headlock, and finish before the referee stands them up.

Failure modes

  • The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.

Rodrigues — paths

  1. One clean counter or lead hook as Spivac enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
  2. Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.

Failure modes

  • If the first takedown lands, Rodrigues may spend the round on the fence or on their back.

Swing variables

  • If Spivac cannot keep this on the mat in the first eight minutes, Rodrigues's striking becomes the fight.
  • First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.

What moved it from 50/50

  • Striking skill (distance & pocket)Rodrigues −0.52

    Spivac striking rating 1480 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (68%).

  • Grappling / controlSpivac +0.29

    Takedown threat Spivac 2.01 vs Rodrigues 0.73 per 15. Estimated grappling share 32%.

  • Recency and opponent-adjusted formSpivac +0.12

    Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Spivac +0.55 vs Rodrigues +0.02. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.

  • Power vs durabilityRodrigues −0.11

    Spivac has been hurt at a rate that matters against Rodrigues's power.

  • Age / athletic windowSpivac +0.07

    Spivac 31 vs Rodrigues 34. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.

  • Pressure wrestling vs takedown defenseSpivac +0.06

    Rodrigues's takedown defense (61%) is a hole against a high-volume wrestler. Historically this pair type tilts to control and attrition.

  • Finishing threat vs durabilitySpivac +0.01

    Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.

Attribute radar

Spivac · Rodrigues

Side-by-side

Spivac: pressure wrestler · ground pounder · clinch grinder — Rodrigues: power puncher · pressure boxer · opportunistic

SpivacRodrigues
Record17-516-6
Age (fight night)3134
Height6'3"6'2"
Reach78"75"
StanceOrthodoxOrthodox
SLpM3.25.2
SApM2.44.1
Str. acc.52%51%
Str. def.55%49%
KD / 150.280.92
TD avg3.81.6
TD acc.46%38%
TD def.72%61%
Sub avg0.70.3
Control / 155.8m1.8m
Late-round diff0.10-0.08
Layoff140d126d
Datadeepdeep

Spivac range mix

  • Distance
    40%
  • Clinch
    16%
  • Ground
    44%
  • Head
    58%
  • Body
    22%
  • Leg
    20%

Rodrigues range mix

  • Distance
    72%
  • Clinch
    12%
  • Ground
    16%
  • Head
    64%
  • Body
    20%
  • Leg
    16%

DraftKings / Fanatics props

Method, rounds, distance, and inside-the-distance markets the books actually post. Model probability is independent. Edge is model minus DraftKings no-vig. Fanatics is a second print — it will not always be up, especially on PFL and ONE.

Method of victory

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Spivac KO/TKO

Model

5.5%

Fair

+1708

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Spivac submission

Model

11.6%

Fair

+761

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Spivac decision

Model

30.6%

Fair

+226

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues KO/TKO

Model

10.9%

Fair

+817

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues submission

Model

4.9%

Fair

+1953

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues decision

Model

36.4%

Fair

+174

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Model split: KO/TKO 16% · submission 16% · decision 67%
  • Career KO rates (shrunk by the book, not the model): Spivac 41% · Rodrigues 69%
  • Standing share 68%. Book prices come from moneyline × career mix; CORNER splits the same win probability by knockdown rate, sub attempts, and durability.

Over/under 1.5 rounds

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Over 1.5 rounds

Model

81.7%

Fair

-446

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Under 1.5 rounds

Model

18.3%

Fair

+446

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish mass 33% · decision 67%
  • Grappling share 32% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
  • Over 1.5: model needs the fight to clear the 1.5-round mark (P 82%)

Over/under 2.5 rounds

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Over 2.5 rounds

Model

71.8%

Fair

-255

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Under 2.5 rounds

Model

28.2%

Fair

+255

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish mass 33% · decision 67%
  • Grappling share 32% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
  • Over 2.5: model needs the fight to clear the 2.5-round mark (P 72%)

Fight goes the distance

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Goes the distance

Model

67.1%

Fair

-204

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Does not go the distance

Model

32.9%

Fair

+204

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Decision mass Spivac 31% + Rodrigues 36%
  • Finish mass 33% from KO/SUB on either side
  • 3×5. Expected time 12.6 min

Inside the distance

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Spivac inside the distance

Model

17.1%

Fair

+483

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Spivac not inside the distance

Model

82.8%

Fair

-483

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues inside the distance

Model

15.8%

Fair

+534

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues not inside the distance

Model

84.2%

Fair

-534

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • KO 6% + SUB 12%
  • Spivac 0.28 KD / 15 · 41% of wins by KO/TKO
  • Spivac 0.7 sub attempts / 15 · 47% of wins by submission

Round of finish

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Fight ends in round 1

Model

18.3%

Fair

+446

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Fight ends in round 2

Model

9.9%

Fair

+910

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Fight ends in round 3

Model

4.7%

Fair

+2019

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish-by-round split from the duration curve, not a separate engine
  • Total finish mass 33% distributed across 3 rounds
  • Decision is a different market (goes the distance). Round field is vig-removed against that residual.