Hypothetical · three rounds · current snapshots
Independent projection
medium confidencede Ridder 57%
Moderate conviction. The point estimate is the center of a band, not a prophecy.
90% interval on de Ridder: 42%–71%. Never a lock.
- Most likely
- Decision 63%
- Expected time
- 12:18
- P(over 2.5)
- 68%
- Grappling share
- 33%
Briefing
Reinier de Ridder is the model’s side at 57% because of grappling / control, with Gregory Rodrigues live if the fight is forced into power puncher.
Reinier de Ridder (pressure wrestler, submission hunter, clinch grinder) against Gregory Rodrigues (power puncher, pressure boxer, opportunistic) is a UFC light heavyweight matchup in —. The independent model puts de Ridder around 57% — a medium confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is grappling / control: Takedown threat de Ridder 2.32 vs Rodrigues 0.66 per 15. Estimated grappling share 33%.
Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 33%. de Ridder lands 3.4 significant strikes per minute at 51% accuracy with a 4.2 takedown average; Rodrigues is at 5.2 / 51% / 1.6. Takedown defense sits at 84% versus 61%. Reach is 78" against 75" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.
de Ridder's primary path: Chain takedowns on Rodrigues's 61% defense, hold mat time, and win the control/attrition round. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Rodrigues's preferred range and losing the minute-winning. Rodrigues's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as de Ridder enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: If the first takedown lands, Rodrigues may spend the round on the fence or on their back.
The swing variable is simple: If de Ridder cannot keep this on the mat in the first eight minutes, Rodrigues's striking becomes the fight. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.
Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.
de Ridder — paths
- Chain takedowns on Rodrigues's 61% defense, hold mat time, and win the control/attrition round.
- Force a scramble, hunt the neck or the front headlock, and finish before the referee stands them up.
Failure modes
- Getting drawn into Rodrigues's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.
Rodrigues — paths
- One clean counter or lead hook as de Ridder enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
- Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.
Failure modes
- If the first takedown lands, Rodrigues may spend the round on the fence or on their back.
Swing variables
- If de Ridder cannot keep this on the mat in the first eight minutes, Rodrigues's striking becomes the fight.
- First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.
What moved it from 50/50
- Grappling / controlde Ridder +0.46
Takedown threat de Ridder 2.32 vs Rodrigues 0.66 per 15. Estimated grappling share 33%.
- Striking skill (distance & pocket)Rodrigues −0.43
de Ridder striking rating 1520 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (67%).
- Recency and opponent-adjusted formde Ridder +0.14
Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: de Ridder +0.64 vs Rodrigues +0.02. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.
- Submission hunting vs defensive gapsde Ridder +0.07
de Ridder generates submission attempts against opponents who spend time on the mat.
- Pressure wrestling vs takedown defensede Ridder +0.06
Rodrigues's takedown defense (61%) is a hole against a high-volume wrestler. Historically this pair type tilts to control and attrition.
- Age / athletic windowRodrigues −0.03
de Ridder 35 vs Rodrigues 34. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.
Attribute radar
de Ridder · Rodrigues
Side-by-side
de Ridder: pressure wrestler · submission hunter · clinch grinder — Rodrigues: power puncher · pressure boxer · opportunistic
| de Ridder | Rodrigues | |
|---|---|---|
| Record | 21-3 | 16-6 |
| Age (fight night) | 35 | 34 |
| Height | 6'4" | 6'2" |
| Reach | 78" | 75" |
| Stance | Orthodox | Orthodox |
| SLpM | 3.4 | 5.2 |
| SApM | 2.2 | 4.1 |
| Str. acc. | 51% | 51% |
| Str. def. | 61% | 49% |
| KD / 15 | 0.18 | 0.92 |
| TD avg | 4.2 | 1.6 |
| TD acc. | 52% | 38% |
| TD def. | 84% | 61% |
| Sub avg | 1.4 | 0.3 |
| Control / 15 | 7.1m | 1.8m |
| Late-round diff | 0.18 | -0.08 |
| Layoff | 84d | 126d |
| Data | deep | deep |
de Ridder range mix
- Distance36%
- Clinch14%
- Ground50%
- Head58%
- Body22%
- Leg20%
Rodrigues range mix
- Distance72%
- Clinch12%
- Ground16%
- Head64%
- Body20%
- Leg16%
DraftKings / Fanatics props
Method, rounds, distance, and inside-the-distance markets the books actually post. Model probability is independent. Edge is model minus DraftKings no-vig. Fanatics is a second print — it will not always be up, especially on PFL and ONE.
Method of victory
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
de Ridder KO/TKO
Model
4.1%
Fair
+2357
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
de Ridder submission
Model
20.9%
Fair
+378
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
de Ridder decision
Model
32.1%
Fair
+211
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues KO/TKO
Model
7.9%
Fair
+1163
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues submission
Model
4.1%
Fair
+2345
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues decision
Model
30.9%
Fair
+224
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Model split: KO/TKO 12% · submission 25% · decision 63%
- Career KO rates (shrunk by the book, not the model): de Ridder 19% · Rodrigues 69%
- Standing share 67%. Book prices come from moneyline × career mix; CORNER splits the same win probability by knockdown rate, sub attempts, and durability.
Over/under 1.5 rounds
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Over 1.5 rounds
Model
79.5%
Fair
-388
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Under 1.5 rounds
Model
20.5%
Fair
+388
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Finish mass 37% · decision 63%
- Grappling share 33% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
- Over 1.5: model needs the fight to clear the 1.5-round mark (P 80%)
Over/under 2.5 rounds
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Over 2.5 rounds
Model
68.3%
Fair
-215
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Under 2.5 rounds
Model
31.7%
Fair
+215
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Finish mass 37% · decision 63%
- Grappling share 33% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
- Over 2.5: model needs the fight to clear the 2.5-round mark (P 68%)
Fight goes the distance
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Goes the distance
Model
63.0%
Fair
-170
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Does not go the distance
Model
37.0%
Fair
+170
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Decision mass de Ridder 32% + Rodrigues 31%
- Finish mass 37% from KO/SUB on either side
- 3×5. Expected time 12.3 min
Inside the distance
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
de Ridder inside the distance
Model
25.0%
Fair
+300
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
de Ridder not inside the distance
Model
75.0%
Fair
-300
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues inside the distance
Model
12.0%
Fair
+733
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues not inside the distance
Model
88.0%
Fair
-733
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- KO 4% + SUB 21%
- de Ridder 0.18 KD / 15 · 19% of wins by KO/TKO
- de Ridder 1.4 sub attempts / 15 · 62% of wins by submission
Round of finish
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Fight ends in round 1
Model
20.5%
Fair
+388
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Fight ends in round 2
Model
11.2%
Fair
+793
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Fight ends in round 3
Model
5.3%
Fair
+1790
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Finish-by-round split from the duration curve, not a separate engine
- Total finish mass 37% distributed across 3 rounds
- Decision is a different market (goes the distance). Round field is vig-removed against that residual.