Compare

Any two fighters, current snapshots, three-round hypothetical. Not a booked fight — the engine still runs the same factors.

Hypothetical · three rounds · current snapshots

Independent projection

low confidence

Rodrigues 52%

Wide interval. Thin public data, volatile styles, or a true toss-up. Do not treat the point estimate as a price.

Jones 48%Rodrigues 52%

90% interval on Jones: 35%–62%. Never a lock.

Most likely
Decision 76%
Expected time
13:18
P(over 2.5)
79%
Grappling share
25%

Briefing

Gregory Rodrigues is the model’s side at 52% because of striking skill (distance & pocket), with Mason Jones live if the fight is forced into pressure boxer.

Mason Jones (pressure boxer, volume kickboxer) against Gregory Rodrigues (power puncher, pressure boxer, opportunistic) is a UFC lightweight matchup in —. The independent model puts Rodrigues around 52% — a low confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is striking skill (distance & pocket): Jones striking rating 1660 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (75%).

Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 25%. Jones lands 5.8 significant strikes per minute at 45% accuracy with a 2.2 takedown average; Rodrigues is at 5.2 / 51% / 1.6. Takedown defense sits at 63% versus 61%. Reach is 73" against 75" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.

Jones's primary path: Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Jones's length and volume only matter if Rodrigues cannot crash the pocket. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Rodrigues's preferred range and losing the minute-winning. Rodrigues's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Jones enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Jones's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.

The swing variable is simple: First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.

Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.

Jones — paths

  1. Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Jones's length and volume only matter if Rodrigues cannot crash the pocket.
  2. Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.

Failure modes

  • Getting drawn into Rodrigues's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.

Rodrigues — paths

  1. One clean counter or lead hook as Jones enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
  2. Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.

Failure modes

  • Getting drawn into Jones's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.

Swing variables

  • First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.

What moved it from 50/50

  • Striking skill (distance & pocket)Rodrigues −0.18

    Jones striking rating 1660 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (75%).

  • Age / athletic windowJones +0.07

    Jones 31 vs Rodrigues 34. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.

  • Finishing threat vs durabilityRodrigues −0.03

    Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.

  • Recency and opponent-adjusted formJones +0.03

    Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Jones +0.17 vs Rodrigues +0.02. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.

  • Grappling / controlJones +0.03

    Takedown threat Jones 1.08 vs Rodrigues 0.78 per 15. Estimated grappling share 25%.

Attribute radar

Jones · Rodrigues

Side-by-side

Jones: pressure boxer · volume kickboxer — Rodrigues: power puncher · pressure boxer · opportunistic

JonesRodrigues
Record15-316-6
Age (fight night)3134
Height5'10"6'2"
Reach73"75"
StanceOrthodoxOrthodox
SLpM5.85.2
SApM5.14.1
Str. acc.45%51%
Str. def.50%49%
KD / 150.350.92
TD avg2.21.6
TD acc.36%38%
TD def.63%61%
Sub avg0.30.3
Control / 152.0m1.8m
Late-round diff0.14-0.08
Layoff105d126d
Datadeepdeep

Jones range mix

  • Distance
    76%
  • Clinch
    14%
  • Ground
    10%
  • Head
    62%
  • Body
    22%
  • Leg
    28%

Rodrigues range mix

  • Distance
    72%
  • Clinch
    12%
  • Ground
    16%
  • Head
    64%
  • Body
    20%
  • Leg
    16%

DraftKings / Fanatics props

Method, rounds, distance, and inside-the-distance markets the books actually post. Model probability is independent. Edge is model minus DraftKings no-vig. Fanatics is a second print — it will not always be up, especially on PFL and ONE.

Method of victory

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Jones KO/TKO

Model

6.2%

Fair

+1516

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Jones submission

Model

4.2%

Fair

+2264

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Jones decision

Model

37.6%

Fair

+166

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues KO/TKO

Model

9.5%

Fair

+955

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues submission

Model

4.5%

Fair

+2147

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues decision

Model

38.1%

Fair

+163

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Model split: KO/TKO 16% · submission 9% · decision 76%
  • Career KO rates (shrunk by the book, not the model): Jones 40% · Rodrigues 69%
  • Standing share 75%. Book prices come from moneyline × career mix; CORNER splits the same win probability by knockdown rate, sub attempts, and durability.

Over/under 1.5 rounds

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Over 1.5 rounds

Model

86.5%

Fair

-641

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Under 1.5 rounds

Model

13.5%

Fair

+641

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish mass 24% · decision 76%
  • Grappling share 25% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
  • Over 1.5: model needs the fight to clear the 1.5-round mark (P 87%)

Over/under 2.5 rounds

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Over 2.5 rounds

Model

79.1%

Fair

-378

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Under 2.5 rounds

Model

20.9%

Fair

+378

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish mass 24% · decision 76%
  • Grappling share 25% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
  • Over 2.5: model needs the fight to clear the 2.5-round mark (P 79%)

Fight goes the distance

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Goes the distance

Model

75.6%

Fair

-311

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Does not go the distance

Model

24.4%

Fair

+311

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Decision mass Jones 38% + Rodrigues 38%
  • Finish mass 24% from KO/SUB on either side
  • 3×5. Expected time 13.3 min

Inside the distance

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Jones inside the distance

Model

10.4%

Fair

+860

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Jones not inside the distance

Model

89.6%

Fair

-860

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues inside the distance

Model

13.9%

Fair

+618

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues not inside the distance

Model

86.1%

Fair

-618

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • KO 6% + SUB 4%
  • Jones 0.35 KD / 15 · 40% of wins by KO/TKO
  • Jones 0.3 sub attempts / 15 · 13% of wins by submission

Round of finish

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Fight ends in round 1

Model

13.5%

Fair

+641

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Fight ends in round 2

Model

7.4%

Fair

+1251

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Fight ends in round 3

Model

3.5%

Fair

+2799

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish-by-round split from the duration curve, not a separate engine
  • Total finish mass 24% distributed across 3 rounds
  • Decision is a different market (goes the distance). Round field is vig-removed against that residual.