Hypothetical · three rounds · current snapshots
Independent projection
medium confidenceRabadanov 57%
Moderate conviction. The point estimate is the center of a band, not a prophecy.
90% interval on Rabadanov: 40%–73%. Never a lock.
- Most likely
- Decision 77%
- Expected time
- 13:24
- P(over 2.5)
- 80%
- Grappling share
- 29%
Briefing
Gadzhi Rabadanov is the model’s side at 57% because of grappling / control, with Gregory Rodrigues live if the fight is forced into power puncher.
Gadzhi Rabadanov (sambo, pressure wrestler, point fighter) against Gregory Rodrigues (power puncher, pressure boxer, opportunistic) is a UFC lightweight matchup in —. The independent model puts Rabadanov around 57% — a medium confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is grappling / control: Takedown threat Rabadanov 1.69 vs Rodrigues 0.67 per 15. Estimated grappling share 29%.
Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 29%. Rabadanov lands 3.8 significant strikes per minute at 48% accuracy with a 3.2 takedown average; Rodrigues is at 5.2 / 51% / 1.6. Takedown defense sits at 82% versus 61%. Reach is 70" against 75" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.
Rabadanov's primary path: Chain takedowns on Rodrigues's 61% defense, hold mat time, and win the control/attrition round. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Rodrigues's preferred range and losing the minute-winning. Rodrigues's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Rabadanov enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: If the first takedown lands, Rodrigues may spend the round on the fence or on their back.
The swing variable is simple: If Rabadanov cannot keep this on the mat in the first eight minutes, Rodrigues's striking becomes the fight. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.
Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.
Rabadanov — paths
- Chain takedowns on Rodrigues's 61% defense, hold mat time, and win the control/attrition round.
- Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Rabadanov's length and volume only matter if Rodrigues cannot crash the pocket.
Failure modes
- Getting drawn into Rodrigues's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.
Rodrigues — paths
- One clean counter or lead hook as Rabadanov enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
- Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.
Failure modes
- If the first takedown lands, Rodrigues may spend the round on the fence or on their back.
Swing variables
- If Rabadanov cannot keep this on the mat in the first eight minutes, Rodrigues's striking becomes the fight.
- First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.
What moved it from 50/50
- Grappling / controlRabadanov +0.30
Takedown threat Rabadanov 1.69 vs Rodrigues 0.67 per 15. Estimated grappling share 29%.
- Striking skill (distance & pocket)Rodrigues −0.21
Rabadanov striking rating 1640 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (71%).
- Recency and opponent-adjusted formRabadanov +0.12
Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Rabadanov +0.55 vs Rodrigues +0.02. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.
- Pressure wrestling vs takedown defenseRabadanov +0.06
Rodrigues's takedown defense (61%) is a hole against a high-volume wrestler. Historically this pair type tilts to control and attrition.
- Finishing threat vs durabilityRodrigues −0.03
Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.
- Age / athletic windowRabadanov +0.03
Rabadanov 33 vs Rodrigues 34. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.
Attribute radar
Rabadanov · Rodrigues
Side-by-side
Rabadanov: sambo · pressure wrestler · point fighter — Rodrigues: power puncher · pressure boxer · opportunistic
| Rabadanov | Rodrigues | |
|---|---|---|
| Record | 24-5-1 | 16-6 |
| Age (fight night) | 33 | 34 |
| Height | 5'9" | 6'2" |
| Reach | 70" | 75" |
| Stance | Orthodox | Orthodox |
| SLpM | 3.8 | 5.2 |
| SApM | 2.6 | 4.1 |
| Str. acc. | 48% | 51% |
| Str. def. | 59% | 49% |
| KD / 15 | 0.25 | 0.92 |
| TD avg | 3.2 | 1.6 |
| TD acc. | 46% | 38% |
| TD def. | 82% | 61% |
| Sub avg | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Control / 15 | 4.6m | 1.8m |
| Late-round diff | 0.12 | -0.08 |
| Layoff | 70d | 126d |
| Data | standard | deep |
Rabadanov range mix
- Distance64%
- Clinch14%
- Ground38%
- Head58%
- Body22%
- Leg20%
Rodrigues range mix
- Distance72%
- Clinch12%
- Ground16%
- Head64%
- Body20%
- Leg16%
DraftKings / Fanatics props
Method, rounds, distance, and inside-the-distance markets the books actually post. Model probability is independent. Edge is model minus DraftKings no-vig. Fanatics is a second print — it will not always be up, especially on PFL and ONE.
Method of victory
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Rabadanov KO/TKO
Model
6.0%
Fair
+1572
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rabadanov submission
Model
6.9%
Fair
+1343
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rabadanov decision
Model
44.1%
Fair
+127
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues KO/TKO
Model
6.7%
Fair
+1388
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues submission
Model
3.9%
Fair
+2484
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues decision
Model
32.4%
Fair
+209
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Model split: KO/TKO 13% · submission 11% · decision 77%
- Career KO rates (shrunk by the book, not the model): Rabadanov 33% · Rodrigues 69%
- Standing share 71%. Book prices come from moneyline × career mix; CORNER splits the same win probability by knockdown rate, sub attempts, and durability.
Over/under 1.5 rounds
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Over 1.5 rounds
Model
87.0%
Fair
-669
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Under 1.5 rounds
Model
13.0%
Fair
+669
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Finish mass 24% · decision 77%
- Grappling share 29% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
- Over 1.5: model needs the fight to clear the 1.5-round mark (P 87%)
Over/under 2.5 rounds
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Over 2.5 rounds
Model
79.9%
Fair
-398
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Under 2.5 rounds
Model
20.1%
Fair
+398
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Finish mass 24% · decision 77%
- Grappling share 29% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
- Over 2.5: model needs the fight to clear the 2.5-round mark (P 80%)
Fight goes the distance
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Goes the distance
Model
76.5%
Fair
-326
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Does not go the distance
Model
23.5%
Fair
+326
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Decision mass Rabadanov 44% + Rodrigues 32%
- Finish mass 24% from KO/SUB on either side
- 3×5. Expected time 13.4 min
Inside the distance
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Rabadanov inside the distance
Model
12.9%
Fair
+675
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rabadanov not inside the distance
Model
87.1%
Fair
-675
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues inside the distance
Model
10.6%
Fair
+844
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Rodrigues not inside the distance
Model
89.4%
Fair
-844
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- KO 6% + SUB 7%
- Rabadanov 0.25 KD / 15 · 33% of wins by KO/TKO
- Rabadanov 0.5 sub attempts / 15 · 17% of wins by submission
Round of finish
Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted
Fight ends in round 1
Model
13.0%
Fair
+669
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Fight ends in round 2
Model
7.1%
Fair
+1308
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
Fight ends in round 3
Model
3.4%
Fair
+2841
DraftKings
Not posted
Fanatics
Not posted
- Finish-by-round split from the duration curve, not a separate engine
- Total finish mass 24% distributed across 3 rounds
- Decision is a different market (goes the distance). Round field is vig-removed against that residual.