Compare

Any two fighters, current snapshots, three-round hypothetical. Not a booked fight — the engine still runs the same factors.

Hypothetical · three rounds · current snapshots

Independent projection

medium confidence

Lopes 54%

Moderate conviction. The point estimate is the center of a band, not a prophecy.

Lopes 54%Rodrigues 46%

90% interval on Lopes: 38%–70%. Never a lock.

Most likely
Decision 65%
Expected time
12:24
P(over 2.5)
70%
Grappling share
25%

Briefing

Diego Lopes is the model’s side at 54% because of grappling / control, with Gregory Rodrigues live if the fight is forced into power puncher.

Diego Lopes (submission hunter, power puncher, opportunistic) against Gregory Rodrigues (power puncher, pressure boxer, opportunistic) is a UFC featherweight matchup in —. The independent model puts Lopes around 54% — a medium confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is grappling / control: Takedown threat Lopes 1.02 vs Rodrigues 0.79 per 15. Estimated grappling share 25%.

Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 25%. Lopes lands 4.6 significant strikes per minute at 48% accuracy with a 2.0 takedown average; Rodrigues is at 5.2 / 51% / 1.6. Takedown defense sits at 62% versus 61%. Reach is 72" against 75" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.

Lopes's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Rodrigues enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Rodrigues's preferred range and losing the minute-winning. Rodrigues's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Lopes enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.

The swing variable is simple: First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.

Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.

Lopes — paths

  1. One clean counter or lead hook as Rodrigues enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
  2. Force a scramble, hunt the neck or the front headlock, and finish before the referee stands them up.

Failure modes

  • Getting drawn into Rodrigues's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.

Rodrigues — paths

  1. One clean counter or lead hook as Lopes enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
  2. Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.

Failure modes

  • The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.

Swing variables

  • First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.

What moved it from 50/50

  • Grappling / controlLopes +0.21

    Takedown threat Lopes 1.02 vs Rodrigues 0.79 per 15. Estimated grappling share 25%.

  • Recency and opponent-adjusted formRodrigues −0.16

    Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Lopes -0.69 vs Rodrigues +0.02. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.

  • Age / athletic windowLopes +0.07

    Lopes 31 vs Rodrigues 34. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.

  • Submission hunting vs defensive gapsLopes +0.07

    Lopes generates submission attempts against opponents who spend time on the mat.

  • Striking skill (distance & pocket)Rodrigues −0.04

    Lopes striking rating 1720 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (75%).

  • Finishing threat vs durabilityLopes +0.01

    Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.

Attribute radar

Lopes · Rodrigues

Side-by-side

Lopes: submission hunter · power puncher · opportunistic — Rodrigues: power puncher · pressure boxer · opportunistic

LopesRodrigues
Record26-716-6
Age (fight night)3134
Height5'10"6'2"
Reach72"75"
StanceOrthodoxOrthodox
SLpM4.65.2
SApM4.04.1
Str. acc.48%51%
Str. def.52%49%
KD / 150.550.92
TD avg2.01.6
TD acc.41%38%
TD def.62%61%
Sub avg1.20.3
Control / 154.6m1.8m
Late-round diff0.08-0.08
Layoff126d126d
Datadeepdeep

Lopes range mix

  • Distance
    74%
  • Clinch
    14%
  • Ground
    42%
  • Head
    68%
  • Body
    22%
  • Leg
    10%

Rodrigues range mix

  • Distance
    72%
  • Clinch
    12%
  • Ground
    16%
  • Head
    64%
  • Body
    20%
  • Leg
    16%

DraftKings / Fanatics props

Method, rounds, distance, and inside-the-distance markets the books actually post. Model probability is independent. Edge is model minus DraftKings no-vig. Fanatics is a second print — it will not always be up, especially on PFL and ONE.

Method of victory

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Lopes KO/TKO

Model

8.0%

Fair

+1148

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Lopes submission

Model

13.7%

Fair

+629

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Lopes decision

Model

32.7%

Fair

+206

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues KO/TKO

Model

9.5%

Fair

+957

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues submission

Model

3.9%

Fair

+2477

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues decision

Model

32.2%

Fair

+210

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Model split: KO/TKO 17% · submission 18% · decision 65%
  • Career KO rates (shrunk by the book, not the model): Lopes 42% · Rodrigues 69%
  • Standing share 75%. Book prices come from moneyline × career mix; CORNER splits the same win probability by knockdown rate, sub attempts, and durability.

Over/under 1.5 rounds

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Over 1.5 rounds

Model

80.5%

Fair

-413

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Under 1.5 rounds

Model

19.5%

Fair

+413

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish mass 35% · decision 65%
  • Grappling share 25% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
  • Over 1.5: model needs the fight to clear the 1.5-round mark (P 81%)

Over/under 2.5 rounds

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Over 2.5 rounds

Model

70.0%

Fair

-233

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Under 2.5 rounds

Model

30.0%

Fair

+233

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish mass 35% · decision 65%
  • Grappling share 25% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
  • Over 2.5: model needs the fight to clear the 2.5-round mark (P 70%)

Fight goes the distance

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Goes the distance

Model

64.9%

Fair

-185

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Does not go the distance

Model

35.1%

Fair

+185

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Decision mass Lopes 33% + Rodrigues 32%
  • Finish mass 35% from KO/SUB on either side
  • 3×5. Expected time 12.4 min

Inside the distance

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Lopes inside the distance

Model

21.7%

Fair

+360

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Lopes not inside the distance

Model

78.3%

Fair

-360

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues inside the distance

Model

13.3%

Fair

+650

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues not inside the distance

Model

86.7%

Fair

-650

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • KO 8% + SUB 14%
  • Lopes 0.55 KD / 15 · 42% of wins by KO/TKO
  • Lopes 1.2 sub attempts / 15 · 42% of wins by submission

Round of finish

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Fight ends in round 1

Model

19.5%

Fair

+413

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Fight ends in round 2

Model

10.5%

Fair

+852

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Fight ends in round 3

Model

5.1%

Fair

+1869

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish-by-round split from the duration curve, not a separate engine
  • Total finish mass 35% distributed across 3 rounds
  • Decision is a different market (goes the distance). Round field is vig-removed against that residual.