Compare

Any two fighters, current snapshots, three-round hypothetical. Not a booked fight — the engine still runs the same factors.

Hypothetical · three rounds · current snapshots

Independent projection

medium confidence

Rodrigues 66%

Moderate conviction. The point estimate is the center of a band, not a prophecy.

Judice 34%Rodrigues 66%

90% interval on Judice: 20%–52%. Never a lock.

Most likely
Decision 72%
Expected time
13:00
P(over 2.5)
76%
Grappling share
22%

Briefing

Gregory Rodrigues is the model’s side at 66% because of striking skill (distance & pocket), with Carli Judice live if the fight is forced into volume kickboxer.

Carli Judice (volume kickboxer, southpaw kicker) against Gregory Rodrigues (power puncher, pressure boxer, opportunistic) is a UFC women's flyweight matchup in —. The independent model puts Rodrigues around 66% — a medium confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is striking skill (distance & pocket): Judice striking rating 1414 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (78%).

Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 22%. Judice lands 4.4 significant strikes per minute at 44% accuracy with a 1.2 takedown average; Rodrigues is at 5.2 / 51% / 1.6. Takedown defense sits at 70% versus 61%. Reach is 67" against 75" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.

Judice's primary path: Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Judice's length and volume only matter if Rodrigues cannot crash the pocket. Failure mode: The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math. Rodrigues's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Judice enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Judice's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.

The swing variable is simple: First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.

Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.

Judice — paths

  1. Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Judice's length and volume only matter if Rodrigues cannot crash the pocket.
  2. Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.

Failure modes

  • The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.

Rodrigues — paths

  1. One clean counter or lead hook as Judice enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
  2. Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.

Failure modes

  • Getting drawn into Judice's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.

Swing variables

  • First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.

What moved it from 50/50

  • Striking skill (distance & pocket)Rodrigues −0.75

    Judice striking rating 1414 vs Rodrigues 1740. Weighted by estimated standing time (78%).

  • Recency and opponent-adjusted formJudice +0.10

    Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Judice +0.46 vs Rodrigues +0.02. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.

  • Age / athletic windowJudice +0.09

    Judice 28 vs Rodrigues 34. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.

  • Finishing threat vs durabilityRodrigues −0.06

    Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.

Attribute radar

Judice · Rodrigues

Side-by-side

Judice: volume kickboxer · southpaw kicker — Rodrigues: power puncher · pressure boxer · opportunistic

JudiceRodrigues
Record6-116-6
Age (fight night)2834
Height5'6"6'2"
Reach67"75"
StanceSouthpawOrthodox
SLpM4.45.2
SApM3.54.1
Str. acc.44%51%
Str. def.54%49%
KD / 150.300.92
TD avg1.21.6
TD acc.36%38%
TD def.70%61%
Sub avg0.30.3
Control / 152.0m1.8m
Late-round diff0.00-0.08
Layoff77d126d
Datastandarddeep

Judice range mix

  • Distance
    81%
  • Clinch
    14%
  • Ground
    6%
  • Head
    58%
  • Body
    22%
  • Leg
    27%

Rodrigues range mix

  • Distance
    72%
  • Clinch
    12%
  • Ground
    16%
  • Head
    64%
  • Body
    20%
  • Leg
    16%

DraftKings / Fanatics props

Method, rounds, distance, and inside-the-distance markets the books actually post. Model probability is independent. Edge is model minus DraftKings no-vig. Fanatics is a second print — it will not always be up, especially on PFL and ONE.

Method of victory

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Judice KO/TKO

Model

4.1%

Fair

+2363

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Judice submission

Model

3.1%

Fair

+3075

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Judice decision

Model

26.8%

Fair

+273

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues KO/TKO

Model

15.2%

Fair

+559

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues submission

Model

5.3%

Fair

+1773

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues decision

Model

45.5%

Fair

+120

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Model split: KO/TKO 19% · submission 8% · decision 72%
  • Career KO rates (shrunk by the book, not the model): Judice 33% · Rodrigues 69%
  • Standing share 79%. Book prices come from moneyline × career mix; CORNER splits the same win probability by knockdown rate, sub attempts, and durability.

Over/under 1.5 rounds

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Over 1.5 rounds

Model

84.6%

Fair

-549

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Under 1.5 rounds

Model

15.4%

Fair

+549

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish mass 28% · decision 72%
  • Grappling share 22% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
  • Over 1.5: model needs the fight to clear the 1.5-round mark (P 85%)

Over/under 2.5 rounds

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Over 2.5 rounds

Model

76.2%

Fair

-320

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Under 2.5 rounds

Model

23.8%

Fair

+320

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish mass 28% · decision 72%
  • Grappling share 22% tends to stretch clock; knockdown rate compresses it
  • Over 2.5: model needs the fight to clear the 2.5-round mark (P 76%)

Fight goes the distance

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Goes the distance

Model

72.3%

Fair

-261

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Does not go the distance

Model

27.7%

Fair

+261

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Decision mass Judice 27% + Rodrigues 45%
  • Finish mass 28% from KO/SUB on either side
  • 3×5. Expected time 13.0 min

Inside the distance

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Judice inside the distance

Model

7.2%

Fair

+1287

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Judice not inside the distance

Model

92.8%

Fair

-1287

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues inside the distance

Model

20.5%

Fair

+387

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Rodrigues not inside the distance

Model

79.5%

Fair

-387

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • KO 4% + SUB 3%
  • Judice 0.30 KD / 15 · 33% of wins by KO/TKO
  • Judice 0.3 sub attempts / 15 · 17% of wins by submission

Round of finish

Model only — not on the DK board · Fanatics not posted

Fight ends in round 1

Model

15.4%

Fair

+549

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Fight ends in round 2

Model

8.4%

Fair

+1090

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

Fight ends in round 3

Model

3.9%

Fair

+2445

DraftKings

Not posted

Fanatics

Not posted

  • Finish-by-round split from the duration curve, not a separate engine
  • Total finish mass 28% distributed across 3 rounds
  • Decision is a different market (goes the distance). Round field is vig-removed against that residual.