Noche UFC/Featherweight · 3×5
Independent projection
medium confidenceVallejos 60%
Moderate conviction. The point estimate is the center of a band, not a prophecy.
90% interval on Vallejos: 46%–73%. Never a lock.
- Most likely
- Decision 73%
- Expected time
- 13:06
- P(over 2.5)
- 77%
- Grappling share
- 24%
Model vs market
No edge ≥ 5%| Side | Model | DK (no vig) | Fanatics (no vig) | DK juice | Edge vs DK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vallejos | 59.8% | 61.4% | 61.6% | -175 (63.6%) | -1.6% |
| Emmers | 40.2% | 38.6% | 38.4% | +150 (40.0%) | +1.6% |
DK opened -160 / +140. Now -175 / +150. Line movement is market context, not a model input.
DK total 2.5: over -115 / under +87. Model P(over 2.5) 77%.
Books last snapshotted 19 Aug 2026, 4:00 PM ET. Fanatics and DraftKings will not always post the same PFL/ONE markets.
Briefing
Kevin Vallejos is the model’s side at 60% because of recency and opponent-adjusted form, with Jamall Emmers live if the fight is forced into volume kickboxer.
Kevin Vallejos (pressure boxer, power puncher) against Jamall Emmers (volume kickboxer, scrambler) is a UFC featherweight matchup in Glendale, AZ. The independent model puts Vallejos around 60% — a medium confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is recency and opponent-adjusted form: Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Vallejos +0.28 vs Emmers -0.58. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.
Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 24%. Vallejos lands 5.0 significant strikes per minute at 48% accuracy with a 1.2 takedown average; Emmers is at 4.6 / 44% / 2.4. Takedown defense sits at 68% versus 68%. Reach is 71" against 73" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.
Vallejos's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Emmers enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Emmers's preferred range and losing the minute-winning. Emmers's primary path: Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Emmers's length and volume only matter if Vallejos cannot crash the pocket. Failure mode: The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.
The swing variable is simple: First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.
Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.
Vallejos — paths
- One clean counter or lead hook as Emmers enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
- Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.
Failure modes
- Getting drawn into Emmers's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.
Emmers — paths
- Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Emmers's length and volume only matter if Vallejos cannot crash the pocket.
- Force a scramble, hunt the neck or the front headlock, and finish before the referee stands them up.
- Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.
Failure modes
- The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.
Swing variables
- First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.
What moved it from 50/50
- Recency and opponent-adjusted formVallejos +0.19
Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Vallejos +0.28 vs Emmers -0.58. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.
- Striking skill (distance & pocket)Vallejos +0.16
Vallejos striking rating 1481 vs Emmers 1411. Weighted by estimated standing time (76%).
- Age / athletic windowVallejos +0.15
Vallejos 25 vs Emmers 37. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.
- Reach that is actually usedEmmers −0.11
Emmers has the length and a kicking / distance profile to spend time at range.
- Grappling / controlEmmers −0.08
Takedown threat Vallejos 0.56 vs Emmers 1.12 per 15. Estimated grappling share 24%.
- Finishing threat vs durabilityVallejos +0.05
Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.
- Layoff / rust vs freshnessVallejos +0.02
Vallejos 70 days out · Emmers 168 days out. Optimal window ~60–150 days; long layoffs get a conservative rust prior, not a career rewrite.
Attribute radar
Vallejos · Emmers
Side-by-side
Vallejos: pressure boxer · power puncher — Emmers: volume kickboxer · scrambler
| Vallejos | Emmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Record | 16-1 | 22-8 |
| Age (fight night) | 25 | 37 |
| Height | 5'9" | 5'10" |
| Reach | 71" | 73" |
| Stance | Orthodox | Orthodox |
| SLpM | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| SApM | 3.4 | 3.8 |
| Str. acc. | 48% | 44% |
| Str. def. | 52% | 54% |
| KD / 15 | 0.70 | 0.30 |
| TD avg | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| TD acc. | 36% | 36% |
| TD def. | 68% | 68% |
| Sub avg | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| Control / 15 | 2.0m | 2.2m |
| Late-round diff | 0.12 | 0.05 |
| Layoff | 70d | 168d |
| Data | deep | deep |
Vallejos range mix
- Distance72%
- Clinch14%
- Ground14%
- Head65%
- Body22%
- Leg13%
Emmers range mix
- Distance82%
- Clinch14%
- Ground6%
- Head58%
- Body22%
- Leg28%
Method of victory
- Vallejos KO/TKO12%
- Vallejos SUB5%
- Vallejos DEC43%
- Emmers KO/TKO5%
- Emmers SUB5%
- Emmers DEC30%