Noche UFC/Featherweight · 3×5

Independent projection

medium confidence

Vallejos 60%

Moderate conviction. The point estimate is the center of a band, not a prophecy.

Vallejos 60%Emmers 40%

90% interval on Vallejos: 46%73%. Never a lock.

Most likely
Decision 73%
Expected time
13:06
P(over 2.5)
77%
Grappling share
24%

Model vs market

No edge ≥ 5%
SideModelDK (no vig)Fanatics (no vig)DK juiceEdge vs DK
Vallejos59.8%61.4%61.6%-175 (63.6%)-1.6%
Emmers40.2%38.6%38.4%+150 (40.0%)+1.6%

DK opened -160 / +140. Now -175 / +150. Line movement is market context, not a model input.

DK total 2.5: over -115 / under +87. Model P(over 2.5) 77%.

Books last snapshotted 19 Aug 2026, 4:00 PM ET. Fanatics and DraftKings will not always post the same PFL/ONE markets.

Briefing

Kevin Vallejos is the model’s side at 60% because of recency and opponent-adjusted form, with Jamall Emmers live if the fight is forced into volume kickboxer.

Kevin Vallejos (pressure boxer, power puncher) against Jamall Emmers (volume kickboxer, scrambler) is a UFC featherweight matchup in Glendale, AZ. The independent model puts Vallejos around 60% — a medium confidence number, not a betting line. The largest factor from 50/50 is recency and opponent-adjusted form: Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Vallejos +0.28 vs Emmers -0.58. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.

Where this is fought matters. Estimated grappling share is 24%. Vallejos lands 5.0 significant strikes per minute at 48% accuracy with a 1.2 takedown average; Emmers is at 4.6 / 44% / 2.4. Takedown defense sits at 68% versus 68%. Reach is 71" against 73" — counted only if the longer fighter actually lives at range.

Vallejos's primary path: One clean counter or lead hook as Emmers enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself. Failure mode: Getting drawn into Emmers's preferred range and losing the minute-winning. Emmers's primary path: Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Emmers's length and volume only matter if Vallejos cannot crash the pocket. Failure mode: The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.

The swing variable is simple: First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early. The model does not start from a sportsbook. If DraftKings or Fanatics disagree, that disagreement is the point of the page.

Written from the independent projection. Betting lines are not inputs. Stats as of 19 Aug 2026.

Vallejos — paths

  1. One clean counter or lead hook as Emmers enters. Power is the shortcut; it is not a plan by itself.
  2. Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.

Failure modes

  • Getting drawn into Emmers's preferred range and losing the minute-winning.

Emmers — paths

  1. Keep this at kicking range for the first 6–8 minutes. Emmers's length and volume only matter if Vallejos cannot crash the pocket.
  2. Force a scramble, hunt the neck or the front headlock, and finish before the referee stands them up.
  3. Win the minute-to-minute with volume. Judges in this matchup will see the fighter who walks the other one down.

Failure modes

  • The chin has been a problem. One pocket exchange can end the math.

Swing variables

  • First fighter to be dropped. Power is asymmetric here; the model’s decision lean dies if someone gets hurt early.

What moved it from 50/50

  • Recency and opponent-adjusted formVallejos +0.19

    Last-5 opponent-adjusted form: Vallejos +0.28 vs Emmers -0.58. Single-fight noise is deliberately underweighted.

  • Striking skill (distance & pocket)Vallejos +0.16

    Vallejos striking rating 1481 vs Emmers 1411. Weighted by estimated standing time (76%).

  • Age / athletic windowVallejos +0.15

    Vallejos 25 vs Emmers 37. Peak assumed ~30; decline prior is gentle and never treated as destiny.

  • Reach that is actually usedEmmers 0.11

    Emmers has the length and a kicking / distance profile to spend time at range.

  • Grappling / controlEmmers 0.08

    Takedown threat Vallejos 0.56 vs Emmers 1.12 per 15. Estimated grappling share 24%.

  • Finishing threat vs durabilityVallejos +0.05

    Who is more likely to be hurt, and who has actually finished people of this quality.

  • Layoff / rust vs freshnessVallejos +0.02

    Vallejos 70 days out · Emmers 168 days out. Optimal window ~60–150 days; long layoffs get a conservative rust prior, not a career rewrite.

Attribute radar

Vallejos · Emmers

Side-by-side

Vallejos: pressure boxer · power puncherEmmers: volume kickboxer · scrambler

VallejosEmmers
Record16-122-8
Age (fight night)2537
Height5'9"5'10"
Reach71"73"
StanceOrthodoxOrthodox
SLpM5.04.6
SApM3.43.8
Str. acc.48%44%
Str. def.52%54%
KD / 150.700.30
TD avg1.22.4
TD acc.36%36%
TD def.68%68%
Sub avg0.30.7
Control / 152.0m2.2m
Late-round diff0.120.05
Layoff70d168d
Datadeepdeep

Vallejos range mix

  • Distance
    72%
  • Clinch
    14%
  • Ground
    14%
  • Head
    65%
  • Body
    22%
  • Leg
    13%

Emmers range mix

  • Distance
    82%
  • Clinch
    14%
  • Ground
    6%
  • Head
    58%
  • Body
    22%
  • Leg
    28%

Method of victory

  • Vallejos KO/TKO
    12%
  • Vallejos SUB
    5%
  • Vallejos DEC
    43%
  • Emmers KO/TKO
    5%
  • Emmers SUB
    5%
  • Emmers DEC
    30%